Who Decides? Professional Conduct, Authority, and Ethical Agency in Tension
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62882/91a9s696Keywords:
ethical discernment, institutional power, professional reputation, intellectual property, due processAbstract
This case explores ethical tensions arising during a professional development session delivered by an independent ethics consultant for a global professional body. The consultant declined to use the organisation’s branded slide template due to copyright concerns regarding intellectual property ownership. During the session, she used this dilemma as a live example of ethical discernment.
Organisational representatives reacted defensively, interrupted the session, and later confronted the presenter during a private discussion. The session was further disrupted by a security breach in the online environment. The consultant subsequently raised concerns with institutional leadership in confidence.
Some time later, she was informed that the organisation had judged her behaviour “unprofessional”. No formal inquiry or dialogue had occurred.
This case examines ethical voice, institutional power, professional reputation, due process, intellectual property concerns, and the tensions that can arise when independent ethical frameworks intersect with organisational authority.
References
Bird, F. B., & Waters, J. A. (1989). The moral muteness of managers. California Management Review, 32(1), 73–88.
Breakey, H. (2017) Building Ethics Regimes: Capabilities, Obstacles and Supports for Professional Ethical Decision-Making. University of New South Wales Law Journal 40(1), 322-52. https://doi.org/10.53637/CCSW1499.
Breakey, H. (2021). “That’s unhelpful, harmful and offensive!” Epistemic and ethical concerns with meta-argument allegations. Argumentation, 35(3), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09538-8
Breakey, H. (2022) The Comprehensive Multidimensional Legitimacy Model: A Methodology for Applied Ethics
Evaluation, Institutional Diagnosis and Practical Reform Initiatives. Research in Ethical Issues in Organisations 26, 93-112.
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091328
Paine, L. S. (1994). Managing for organizational integrity. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 106–117.
Gioia, D. A. (1992) Pinto Fires and Personal Ethics: A Script Analysis of Missed Opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics 11, 379-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00870550
Radzik, L. (2020). The ethics of social punishment: The enforcement of morality in everyday life. Oxford University Press.
Rogers, J., & Breakey, H. (2023) James Rest’s Four Component Model (FCM): A Case for Its Central Place in Legal Ethics. Chap. 12 In Leading Works in Legal Ethics, edited by Julian Webb, 226-51. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2023.
Schwartz, M. S. (2013). Developing and sustaining an ethical corporate culture: The core elements. Business Horizons, 56(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2012.09.002
Smith, W.-A. (2025). Courageous Becoming: Cultivating ethicality. Journal of Coaching Ethics, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.62882/47adx108
Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (2004). Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SORE.0000027411.35832.53
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306294258
Published
Data Availability Statement
-
No empirical dataset was generated for this study. The case is based on anonymised professional experience and adapted for ethical analysis.
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wendy-Ann Smith, Hugh Breakey
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Published open access under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (CC BY-NC-ND). This license permits others to share the work with proper attribution, for non-commercial purposes only, and without any modifications.
